{
  "id": "CL-0002",
  "slug": "cl-0002",
  "topic": "AI in Medicine",
  "state": "pending",
  "status": "Prospective evidence pending",
  "org": "Microsoft AI",
  "date": "2026-10-22",
  "title": "Do MAI-DxO's retrospective results establish benefits for real patients?",
  "summary": "Microsoft reported 83% diagnostic accuracy over 304 retrospective complex cases. The reported clinician comparison used a smaller 56-case subset; patient benefits are unproven.",
  "scope": "The 304-case evaluation and the 56-case physician subset must not be treated as equal comparison samples.",
  "next": "Prospective clinical evaluations with independent review, diagnostic safety and patient outcomes.",
  "news": "/news/microsoft-mai-dxo-sequential-diagnosis-science-2026/",
  "hub": "/ai-in-medicine/",
  "sources": [
    [
      "Microsoft: Building Medical Superintelligence",
      "https://microsoft.ai/news/building-medical-superintelligence/"
    ],
    [
      "Science research paper DOI",
      "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeh7930"
    ]
  ],
  "events": [
    [
      "Oct 22, 2026",
      "Research disclosed",
      "Microsoft described sequential-diagnosis benchmarks and its diagnostic orchestrator."
    ],
    [
      "Oct 23, 2026",
      "Cortist analysis",
      "The different evaluation denominators and prospective validation limits were documented."
    ]
  ],
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "snapshotVersion": 1,
  "snapshotPublished": "2026-10-25",
  "reviewType": "Source-grounded baseline, not independently certified",
  "historyPolicy": "Future material evidence is append-only. Preserve this version.",
  "commercialServiceAvailable": false
}