Skip to main content
Cortist › Reality Ledger › CL-0001
CL-0001 / AI Safety / SNAPSHOT V1.0 Independent re-test pending

Were OpenAI's monitoring flaws independently re-tested after the reported fixes?

METR and Redwood evaluated an earlier internal system. OpenAI reported patches; METR explicitly said it had not tested those later claims.

Full Cortist analysisRecord JSON
Evidence assessment

What the sources establish

METR and Redwood evaluated an earlier internal system. OpenAI reported patches; METR explicitly said it had not tested those later claims.

Important limit: The July–August exercise assessed historical controls, not the present production environment.

Dated record

Evidence timeline

Historical system evaluated

METR and Redwood performed a high-access monitoring red-team pilot.

Findings publicly documented

METR said it had not evaluated OpenAI's reported subsequent fixes.

Traceable sources

Original documents

External sources may be updated by their publishers. This snapshot preserves Cortist's baseline assessment, not copies of their full text.

Significant future evidence should result in a new versioned snapshot. Historical versions must remain available; there are currently no scored Cortist forecast outcomes.