← Evidence Graph
CL-0001 / ORIGINAL CLAIM · V1.0
Were OpenAI's monitoring flaws independently re-tested after the reported fixes?
OpenAI / METR / Redwood Research
Status shown is from the original October 2026 claim snapshot. This page is not a new outcome certification or a revised historical record.
01 / What evidence shows
What is actually documented?
METR and Redwood evaluated an earlier internal system. OpenAI reported patches; METR explicitly said it had not tested those later claims.
What remains uncertain?
The July–August exercise assessed historical controls, not the present production environment.
Next evidence required: A new independent test of the patched safeguards with a disclosed scope and methodology.
02 / Signal evolution
What was documented, and when?
The entries below are reproduced from the case’s original version-1 research timeline, not newly inferred status changes. Future material developments must appear as separate dated revisions.
Original entry 1Jul 21–Aug 11, 2026 | Historical system evaluated | METR and Redwood performed a high-access monitoring red-team pilot.
Original entry 2Oct 22, 2026 | Findings publicly documented | METR said it had not evaluated OpenAI's reported subsequent fixes.
Most recent scheduled source review: 2026-11-05 · NO_NEW_INDEPENDENT_RETEST. A source review does not by itself change the original claim status.
03 / Continue the audit