Skip to main content
← Evidence Graph
CORTIST / VERIFICATION COVERAGE · 05 NOV 2026

What was actually checked?

A public accountability matrix that separates historical claim status from confirmed source reviews, independent outcomes and inaccessible external data.

Dated snapshot: These numbers describe the scheduled run on 5 November 2026 at 07:10 UTC. They are not a continuous monitor. Eight claims were not source-checked during that run; this does not mean they were never checked previously. Original claim statuses remain those of 25 October.

10Original claims
2Sources checked in this scheduled run
8Not checked in this run
0New material Ledger revisions
Important audit scope: This 07:10 UTC snapshot of 5 November 2026 covers the ten original October cases only. Ten further cases CL-0011–CL-0020 were added later on 5 November and have initial source-reading records, not new independent reproductions or checks within this earlier scheduled run. Explore all 20 cases ↗
01 / Daily source review

Ten cases. No invented checkmarks.

Each row links to the original claim history. A source re-read confirms only that a primary publication was examined; it does not demonstrate that the underlying AI claim was independently validated or a commitment fulfilled.

CaseOriginal question5 Nov source checkWhat evidence is still needed?
CL-0001
OpenAI / METR / Redwood Research
Were OpenAI's monitoring flaws independently re-tested after the reported fixes?SOURCE RE-READ · 05 NOV
NO_NEW_INDEPENDENT_RETEST
A new independent test of the patched safeguards with a disclosed scope and methodology.
CL-0002
Microsoft AI
Do MAI-DxO's retrospective results establish benefits for real patients?SOURCE RE-READ · 05 NOV
PROSPECTIVE_OUTCOMES_NOT_ESTABLISHED
Prospective clinical evaluations with independent review, diagnostic safety and patient outcomes.
CL-0003
Google Cloud
When can customers independently test Google Agent Compute Engine?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Public customer-preview documentation, supported regions and independently reproducible operational evaluations.
CL-0004
UK AI Security Institute / Anthropic
What did AISI's Mythos 5 incident investigation establish?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Replications, mitigation tests and broader external evaluations beyond the initial scenarios.
CL-0005
ADP Research / Stanford
What does the 3.7% decline in AI-exposed young-worker jobs prove?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Later payroll releases and research separating AI adoption from other labor-market drivers.
CL-0006
Anthropic
Do Anthropic's junior hiring changes prove AI agents displaced workers?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Independent cross-company data on absolute junior hiring, agent adoption and causality.
CL-0007
Modal / NVIDIA
Will NVIDIA Vera's agent-sandbox throughput advantage hold for customers?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
General customer availability, third-party reproduction and realistic performance-per-cost data.
CL-0008
OpenAI
Have OpenAI's updated frontier-training containment controls passed independent review?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
A new externally scoped containment re-test with methodology and evidence of actual controls.
CL-0009
International Energy Agency
Do 134 IEA data-centre grid policies show that the measures work?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Evidence on implementation, connection delays, grid capacity and cost allocation.
CL-0010
Anthropic / METR
Will METR publish independent safety evaluations after gaining access to Anthropic?NOT CHECKED IN THIS RUN
Historical case status not refreshed
Public METR analysis with disclosed test scope, evidence, access limits and independent conclusions.

Next scheduled deeper checks from this audit: CL-0003, CL-0004. No new post-baseline material revisions were recorded. Read the original append-only changes register.

02 / Independent distribution

Hugging Face: verification blocked, not failed.

The daily check could not read the public Hugging Face dataset on 5 November. No discrepancy was established, no upload was attempted and no successful synchronization was claimed.

Recorded result: BLOCKED. Last verified comparison: 2026-11-02. Records verified in this run: 0 of 10. A subsequent authorized readback must establish the current revision before any comparison is described as successful.
03 / Research provenance

12 original source links, inspectable.

Direct primary publications are cited to enable independent readers to verify what was originally claimed. A source list does not automatically verify the claim. Some sources are authored by the organization whose assertion is being tracked.

No external third-party publications are relicensed. Cite the original publishers for their own material and Cortist for its original compilation, case identifiers and editorial analysis where applicable.