CORTIST SIGNALS

Beyond the
headline.

NOV 5, 2026 LATEST EDITION

AI moves fast. We slow down just enough to see what matters. 60 source-based analyses through the Cortist Lens.

THE BIG PICTUREFEATURED EVIDENCE CASE STUDY
LEAD SIGNAL · AI IN MEDICINE / RESEARCH

Microsoft's diagnostic AI reached 83% accuracy. The real test is patients.

The AI scored about 83% across 304 cases; reference-assisted generalists scored about 36% on a smaller 56-case subset. This does not establish safe clinical use.

Oct 23, 2026 · 8 MIN READ ↗
Original Cortist medical AI graphic comparing 83% retrospective AI accuracy with 36% for physicians using references.83%Retrospective diagnostic accuracy
THE SIGNAL FEED60 SOURCE-BASED STORIES

All signals60

RSS ↗
BROWSE BY TOPICResearch, Product Launch, Safety and other labels describe the article type.
THE CORTIST STANDARD

Facts first.
Context always.
Hype never.

We separate documented announcements from company claims and our interpretation. Every story links to its original source and shows what remains uncertain.

Why Cortist exists ↗

Editorial accountability: Articles distinguish primary-source claims from independent verification. How our reporting is sourced and corrected ↗ · 25-article review record ↗

AI promises. What happened next?

Explore Cortist's source-linked Reality Ledger: important AI claims, new evidence and open questions.

Explore the Reality Ledger →